Some members will hold even more firmly to their viewpoints. Some autistics will mistrust parents more. Some parents will mistrust autistics more. And some members will mistrust their own. Some on both sides will withdraw. Some will show less concern for each other's well-being, focusing on our own and our family's. Community cooperation will decrease. Friends will disagree.
This is what happens in an equal rights movement, in a diversity effort. Acknowledging that a group of people within our midst have unequal opportunity because of disability is difficult. We feel remorse for not recognizing the inequities. We feel defensive because we didn't cause the situation. We feel denial because the group includes our own children, for whom we have the most love and best intentions. And, underneath it all, we feel guilt and helplessness for not being able to do more
We feel unstable, no longer sure of ourselves. So that when we are asked to change our language, our behaviors, our views, we resist. We push back. We point out that autistics themselves use inflammatory language. That they stereotype parents. That they discriminate against parents. So, we say, if they're asking us to change, they need to change, too. They need to change their language, their behaviors, their views about parents.
Except that we are not the group being discriminated against. We are not the group at risk for abuse. We are not the group who remain unrepresented on the board of the largest autism organization. We are not the group without a voice in the media.
We neurotypicals don't even identify as "neurotypical" because we don't have to. We aren't classified by our differences. We are individuals first. Disabled persons don't get that choice. They can pass as neurotypical, maybe, sometimes, in some cases. But if they want accommodations, if they want acceptance of their differences, if they want the same opportunities we have, they have to identify as disabled.
Disabled persons are, in fact, discriminated against. When they want equal housing or employment opportunites, they have to rely on legislation, not the goodness of people's hearts. Autistics know that they may be maligned at any time, randomly and without warning, as they were recently in the wake of the Aurora, Colorado shootings. They know that they must use their precious energy in rallies and protests just to get the same civil rights that neurotypicals enjoy, without rallies and protests.
They do not have the power that comes with being the majority.
And because they do not have that power, they must protest. They must rally. They must complain. They must demand attention. They must demand respect. They must demand change.
It is not our place to tell them to watch their language. To change themselves. To respect us first. To stop complaining. This stage of the neurodiversity rights movement is the radical protest stage. It's radical in its demands. It's a protest by nature. Yes, legislation, the ADA, helps a little. It protects some rights. It ensures some opportunities. But it hasn't fixed everything. So the movement proceeds forward to address the many forms of subtle discrimination, the outright torture (like the Judge Rotenberg Center and the bleach treatments), and the malignment of autistics that still exists in everything from education to services to the media.
That doesn't mean we neurotypicals must accept abuse without reason, that we should heap ashes on our heads. It doesn't mean we have to feel guilty or ashamed. It doesn't mean that we won't hear criticisms that are inaccurate. But it does mean that we should listen with compassion, to take the long view of history, to understand that to be autistic, even in this day and age, means to experience discrimination, abuse, and random cruelty because of their disability. It means we should give allowances and leeway, then give some more, in the face of their expressions of distrust and frustration.
We in the neurotypical majority feel anxious faced with a monumental change like the neurodiversity rights movement. Because we might mess up. Because we might fail when we really are trying. Because good intentions are not enough. Because we are being judged. Because pessimism and distrust are directed at us from within the community.
But we can't look at the state of the community right now and declare it hopeless. We can't claim that autistics' protests are invalid because they aren't phrased nicely. Equality movements are messy. They are chaotic. They are filled with the tension, negative feelings, and accusations from decades of discrimination.
We must look forward with the long view of history. Change is slow. Change is messy. But change happens. In the long view, we will establish relationships of trust. In the long view, it will be those relationships which will forge a different kind of community. A community of optimism, of trust, and of acceptance. A community where our children, or perhaps grandchildren, will see differences, not inferiority.
"When I was young, my mother told me not to get into trouble, but Dr. King taught me to get into good trouble, necessary trouble. And I've been getting into good trouble ever since." - Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga).
Right now, autistics are getting into good trouble. They are demanding change. After decades of discrimination, they deserve it.
****
Finally yes change is happening. But unfortunately where I come from, autism is still seen as this horrible disease and kids get discriminated because of it. Such a shame!!!
ReplyDeletethank you.
ReplyDeleteBrenda, you are immensely talented and very intelligent. I am very glad that you are directing your skills and insights into this cause that really needs some clarity from open-minded people.
ReplyDeleteI have a son, now 16, who is severely affected by Autistic Disorder. His disorder deficits were such that we sought medical attention, 15 years ago when he was only a little over one year old, and we had never even heard of autism. Ultimately he was diagnosed at age 2, very young at the time but possible because his deficits were so pronounced. My son's disorder is exactly that, a disorder that restricts his life.
ReplyDeleteI have worked with him since and I have advocated relentlessly in my province here in Canada and federally, over the last 14 years, to obtain help for other autistic children and adults whose family members seek the help they obviously need. We were opposed by governments not wanting to spend money and by some very prominent high functioning autistics who have been given powerful platforms by our federal government, by the media, CBC in particular, and even by our Supreme Court of Canada.
Very high functioning autistics who can appear in high appellate courts, on national television and radio, and in human rights tribunals in Canada and who denounce autism organizations led by parents seeking to help their own children should absolutely be held accountable for their language. In Canada, in the case of Michelle Dawson she appeared in the SCC as an "autistic" intervenor to oppose government funded (Canada has a largely public health care scheme) evidence based intervention for OTHER PEOPLE's autistic children. She has tried to have an effect on the lives of our children and when she makes wild unsubstantiated claims about the parent driven autism organizations she opposes she should be held accountable for those claims and for her opposition to public treatment of other people's autistic children. To suggest otherwise is patronizing and condescending in addition to reckless in disregarding the negative impact such comments have on others.
In the United States, among others, Ari Ne'eman and other very, very high functioning members of the ASAN board of directors, oppose curing autism disorders and even refuse to recognize autism as a disorder. Mr. N is capable of appearing in high profile media presentations, serving on the IACC committee as a "community" representative and even appearing before the Washington Press corps. His abilities are probably beyond that of many "Neurotypicals" to borrow the language of your Neurodiversity ideology. So why should he not be held accountable and challenged to explain his opinions on how society should view autism, what services should be made available and what research conducted?
We live in free societies and we are each free to voice our views and perspectives. I respect your right to voice your opinion. I disagree fundamentally with your opinion and I believe that you are adding to the challenges facing parents seeking to help their own children suffering from the realities of autism disorders.
Harold Doherty
So much ignorance in this comment I don't know how to reply, you are more high functioning than any autistic person, those "very high functioning" autistic people you talk about are disabled like your son and they fight for the rights of all autistic people, including your son, different from you that fights for the rights of the few autistic people you believe deserve your limited pity. How do you know the functional level of people you don't know?Looking normal and having some skills means nothing. Did you even read this post? When did life saving resources like help for all disabled people became a competion? Pretend to help the "low functinong" and leave the rest to die is really what you think we should do? Please think about your prejudice before writing and I hope your son never has the help he needs denied because it depended on people that think like you to give him what he needs to live, we autistic people suffer because of people that think like you, we can't find resources, jobs, support, care, anything because no one is low functioning enough, functioning levels are not stable things, they change, autistic children grow and change, autism changes, people that look normal might not manage their lives and for you we should just shut up and disappear without the help we need to live, we don't deserve basic rights.
DeleteFinally, I care more about autistic children and adults than about their fully complete functional family members so I'm not worried about the challenges parents face, I care about the autistic person more and the author of this post helps any autistic person more than someone who thinks we don't deserve basic rights and refuse to listen to what people like their own son have to say.
Harold, I bet some other high functioning autistics will think me a traitor for saying this, but I get what you're saying. I didn't see anything in your comment suggesting that there should be discrimination against any autistics, high functioning or not (contrary to what someone above me wrote). I think you're saying you want services for your child, and others like your child, and you're sick and tired of the highest functioning autistics claimimg this isn't a disorder (autism) and we shouldn't be trying to find treatments for autism. You and I must agree that's a load of crap. I was initially Dx'd with AS, but later, after more intensive evaluation (an hour a day for 9 days), I was re-Dx'd with mild classic autism, because for AS there can't be significant delays in self care, and I was wetting myself up to 3 or 4 times a day until I was around 10 years old. I am, in some ways, very high functioning. I had no delays in language development and no impairment in IQ, but in other ways I am clearly disabled. I have been able to live on my own, but not without help. I have never been able to support myself. I can not understand everything it takes to handle my own bills; I get confused and frustrated and don't know what I'm doing. My uncle has to sort out my bills, and my family supports me financially. I need help filling out paperwork, which, at 34 years old is humiliating. I have to have a whiteboard with the whole day scheduled out to keep up my apartment. I am in no way even close to being as severly affected as your child, there is NO comparison, clearly, but I am furious every time I hear someone who functions at the highest level claim that we're not disabled. I AM disabled. I NEED help with things the average adult takes for granted that they can do independantly. I wish there was a cure (go ahead, those of you who are higher functioning than me, cyber lynch me if you'd like, I still wish there was a cure so I could live independantly!). With how hard it is for me, I can't imagine how hard it is for your family and your child, and others who face what you and your family face every day. I cry a lot, especially now that my 4 1/2 yr old dd has been Dx'd with it too (higher functioning end, like me). I am a single mom, and need a lot of help with that too. It is hard. It is very, very hard. I am terrified that she'll go through life having to deal with similar things to what I have. I only hope that with such a young Dx, and early intervention, that she'll have brighter prospects. I can talk, my IQ is not impaired, but my life is restricted, seriously restricted, and I would give anything not to have this, and for my daughter to not have this. I'd give anything to be independant, to not feel like a burden on my family, and for my daughter to someday be independant. Maybe with early intervention she will be, but I doubt I ever will, and that is depressingly hard to accept. Again, I can't even imagine how much harder it must be for families like yours.
DeleteMr. Doherty's claims that ASAN leaders say autism is not a disorder are incorrect. His claims that ASAN opposes a cure for autism are confused: ASAN and the neurodiversity movement support assistance and therapies to improve functioning (and of course treatment of any comorbid conditions). They're rather dubious about therapies that merely make autistics do a better job acting less autistic, without helping them be more comfortable in the world and communicate better. They're very upset about the eagerness of some researchers to identify prenatal genetic tests so that parents can terminate pregnancies if autism is suspected.
DeleteThis is a logical concern, given that 90% of pregancies where Down's syndrome is detected are terminated. Given that autism is seen as being a tragic catastrophe for a child and their entire family, there would be a strong motivation to avoid having a potentially autistic child.
And I hope you can see that autistics are upset that the primary research goal is eugenics--not helping autistics lead better lives.
I don't know if Mr. Doherty will be swayed by anything I wrote, but I'm hoping to address other readers who are not already familiar with the neurodiversity movement.
Harold -
ReplyDeleteI understand that you're angry and frustrated, and I respect your experience of those emotions. I do however want to challenge you, specifically in light of Brenda's post, to consider the dichotomy and assumptions that you're presenting. By classifying individuals as "high functioning" or "low functioning," you're inherently basing assumptions on a binary measure which unconsciously says that "high functioning" individuals need less support and are less deserving of services while "low functioning" individuals are less competent and need more. This presents the dilemma of being condescending to some individuals while devaluing others - saying that some individuals are "more" while others are "less". Ranking people along a hierarchal line of functioning (as defined by NTs) is problematic as it perpetuates stereotypes, stigmas, and necessitates judgment and assumptions used to validate ableist rhetoric.
Do you know, "Mr. N." personally? Or do you simply see what he writes, reviews of his work, or watch him for short periods of time on media services? Do you assume just because he can appear "neurotypical" during these periods of time that he faces no struggles, no deficits, no challenges? Those of us who can "pass" according to socio-cultural constructs for short periods of time - who have perceived "temporary" Neurotypical privilege - we still face considerable challenges as well as struggles that should not be defined along the slippery slope of hierarchy. Giving us a fancy label to dictate the fact that we are "other," only devalues the experiences of all autistic people.
Yep. Once you say you're against a "cure" the response is likely "You must be high functioning," or "your child must be high functioning," and "you don't need any help," and so on.
DeletePerhaps some anticipate the worst that can happen because exactly that has been chosen for them based on nothing more than their diagnosis.
ReplyDeleteMy daughters and I have faced wrongful criminalization. Our school district actually fabricated multiple criminal charges they knew to be based on perjury. The DA believed them at their word and didn't take the basic step of checking the allegations made to him.
In one case truancy was claimed after I'd filed an OCR complaint. The district even purged past attendance records so they could claim it was an existing problem (I have those records; they don't mention truancy once). Not one merit of the law I was prosecuted under in JUVENILE COURT had been met .... according to the district's own documentation. The terms of a plea I'd initially been offered were that I'd sign away IDEA protections to keep myself out of jail, I'd open our home to an investigation by CPS (hello, 4th Amendment), and I'd voluntarily commit myself to a mental hospital for a full physchiatric evaluation (I told the DA he needed to word it that way; he'd written it as I would see a doctor). An offer was also made to drop the charges if we withdrew the girls from the district and agreed to homeschool them (what about technological and supplementary needs).
That wasn't working, so the school sought out research based documentation and unilaterally wrote into a BIP what they knew would incite panic in an autistic youth ... for which they had the girls arrested the very next day. The court was less than thrilled and threw the case out ... but irrepairable harm had been done.
That didn't work, and the district knew it couldn't let the case actually get to trial where what they'd done would be exposed, so they attempted to sabotage the court proceedings. That didn't work either.
How dare society stand by while anyone is so throroughly dehumanized.
I don't suffer from autism at all. I revel in the exquisite thought process. My parents never treated me as if I were "suffering", so I never treated my three autistic children that way. One is an Eagle Scout who graduated on the Honor Roll. The next is a published poet and natural artist who writes eloquently from the autistic perspective. The third had a drawing included in a worldwide exhibition of children's art and spearheaded a project that's helped over 1,500 impoverished/hospitalized children in 5 nations to date.
Life will throw enough barriers in the way of our children. It's not in my job description as a parent to add to that.. My children have the right to be who they are, even moreso than who I'd like them to be.
But, what do I know? I've only been autistic for 56 years. I've been married for over 27 of those years. I've had two dream jobs ... left one for the other and that one for parenthood.
Yes, some people have it rougher in life. That's true of anyone and any circumstance. Not here, but I see far too often where those 6 letters (a-u-t-i-s-m-) become more important than the person who has been labeled with them.
Good for you and your family, seriously, it's great that you all have accomplished so much. I am 34 and need help filing out paperwork, can't understand enough to take care of my own bills, have never been able to hold down a job (and I HAVE tried, dozens and dozens of times!), couldn't handle more than one class at a time in college (and therefore hold no degrees, despite very high test scores), haven't driven in 15 years, and generally have to have help from my family with things most people at my age don't think twice about being able to do. Now that I am a single parent with a dd (4 1/2) who has been Dx'd, and how seriously difficult basic things are for me to do, I am finally resigning myself to accepting in home help through a state program. I guess, from what it sounds like, according to you I'm not disabled. But I DO suffer from autism. I am horrified by what the school district and DA put your family through, I see that in that it truely was certain outside people who were the problem, not autism, but for some of us autism IS the problem, not other people. My family has no one else with an ASD, I was adopted as an infant, they are all NT. I have no idea where my daughter and I would be without their help. Please don't discount the experiences of those for whom autism IS disabling, just because it hasn't been for you and yours. But what do I know? I've only ben autistic for 34 years, much less than your 56 years. To say, btw, that "...some have it rougher..." but that that's true of anyone and any circumstance, is an insulting minimization of the real struggles of those who are lower functioning than you. You have NO idea how "rough" it can be.
DeleteWell, I"m 39 and don't have a driver's license. I've failed the road test numerous times. This is disabling in most of the US only b/c this country has not invested in public transportation, which would also reduce pollution. I also can't hold down a regular job. At this point I wouldn't want to work outside of the home, but I do wish there were more opportunities for people to contribute, even if we don't fit the mold of "normal." Really, I DO think the problem is society and not us. Many autistic persons and others that are differently abled would be able to be more productive if just given the opportunity, which we aren't.
DeleteLOL. Story of my life, Brenda! Trouble all the way--some good, some not so good. I really hope this neurodiversity movement gains some traction. I for one am tired of trying to be "normal" and "fit in" when this is impossible. I'm almost 40 yrs old and not going to be cured anytime soon. My son will be 4 yrs old next month, and after all my life experiences, I know he shouldn't be forced to be someone he's not. I celebrate his unique gifts and talents. I just think it's sad that when society looks at us it sees a "rude" or "crazy" mom and a "weird" or "spoiled" little boy. My son and I are both intelligent, caring people with a lot to offer, if only people would stop expecting us to be "normal."
ReplyDeleteWhat's the old saying, that no one ever brought about change by sitting around nicely and waiting for it?
ReplyDeleteWonderful post - thank you for sharing it.
I'm old enough to remember the winning athletes at the Olympics hold up fists cloaked in Black Gloves. And today Chick-Fil-A is doing a ton of business because of it's anti-equal-people stand.
ReplyDeleteAnd you write: "Right now, autistics are getting into good trouble. They are demanding change."
You are awesome!
I'm reminded of a line from an old song by Neil Young: "Heart of Gold"
I'm searching for a heart of gold and I'm getting old.
Thx.
@RednGold1
I find it interesting that so many in society are now accepting of gays, but still will not accept a person with autism. I attribute this to a very effective and powerful political presence on the part of gays. Autistics just don't have that. Our main organization has no autistic board members and seeks to eradicate us. Imagine, wouldn't it be odd if GLAD were promoting a "cure" for homosexuality?
DeleteIf neurotypicals get to decide who's autistic enough (low v. high functioning) is that like white people getting to decide who's "black enough"?
ReplyDeletelol :) good point!
DeleteThat's nonsense. Functioning disparities are a fact. They don't depend on neutotypical perceptions.
DeleteIt is not nonsense. It is brilliant! Harold is not autistic and how dare him to even try to dismiss any of us as not autistic enough for him to listen! He doesn't have the right to do that.
DeleteWho gets to decide and place functioning labels ? You, Lurker, Harold, some other non-autistic person?
Isn't Harold's argument simply a not so clever way of dismissing an autistic person by telling them that they aren't autistic enough? Dismissing them for all the wrong reasons? In fact it is neuro-bigotry to try and silence us!
Sorry, autistic is autistic. Autistic people have more standing in this matter than non-autistic people.
Oh and one more thing, ASAN does NOT claim that autism doesn't come with any disabilities. That claim is rubbish!
Prove it's "brilliant". It's not about being autistic enough or not. It concerns being too abled to be motivated to act in the interests of those who lack lots of ability. I said functioning disparities are a fact. They aren't a decision. The wide variation and ambiguities of functioning differences don't make them untrue.
DeleteI don't understand why someone whose autism has not prevented them from succeeding shouldn't be allowed to support the needs of those whose autism limits their functioning. The leaders of the Black civil rights movement were not necessarily the poorest, least educated, and most downtrodden, so why should people like Mr. Ne'eman be told they can't speak for those who are not in a position to meet with government officials, etc.?
DeleteThey're not just claiming to support the needs of other autistics, they staunchly advocate against cure, while cure would increase ability for those who would otherwise lack it. Leaders of other civil rights movements didn't favor wealth disparities in their activism.
DeleteYou can't cure Autistic Neurology. We are wired differently from before birth.
DeleteAutism is not a removable thing. It is a false goal to keep saying that there is a cure. There is no cure.
Much of the research is for finding a pre-natal test. That kind of test would prevent autism via abortions. Look at how over 90% of Downs babies are aborted. That is not something that we want. Talk about 'cures' is offensive to many autistics.
"This is important, so take a moment to consider it: Autism is a way of being. It is not possible to separate the person from the autism.
Therefore, when parents say, I wish my child did not have autism, what they're really saying is, I wish the autistic child I have did not exist, and I had a different (non-autistic) child instead.
Read that again. This is what we hear when you mourn over our existence. This is what we hear when you pray for a cure. This is what we know, when you tell us of your fondest hopes and dreams for us: that your greatest wish is that one day we will cease to be, and strangers you can love will move in behind our faces." ~ Jim Sinclair
www.autreat.com/dont_mourn.html
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteI've deleted the last few comments to try to get the conversation back on track. Please refrain from ad hominem attacks (adjectives describing the person, rather than the argument). The pros and cons of this debate can be made without any personal attacks. Thank you.
DeleteThank you, autistic dad! You are exactly right about the prenatal testing. That IS how science will "fix" the "problem" of autism. The truth isn't always pretty, but that doesn't make it any less the truth.
Delete"...while cure would increase ability for those who would otherwise lack it."
DeleteNo, lurker, a "cure" would wipe us off the face of the planet.
Any number of therapies and educational strategies and improvements in treating common co-morbid health conditions may increase ability and help us live better. But the only "cure" would be to make sure we don't exist.
No thanks.
Regarding the "facts" about different levels of functioning: the truth is far more complex than the binary "high/low" functioning axis that most people think of. Please reference this excellent post by Caitlin Wray for more: http://blog.rethinkingautism.com/2012/04/16/the-problems-with-labels.aspx
Deletei am 54 years old and have never been diagnosed iwith aspregers but my sons son showed up with it and when he stated reading about it he recgonized it and called me and told me i know you have it .I know that my family have always called me crazy and have not understood why i cry all the time I am soo oversensored that i can walk into a room and know who likes me and who dont i know when the wind is going to change i know things i should not with out anyone saying any thing my mind never shuts off keeps me awake hrs at a time have sevee headachses have photogrraphic memory and also aobsession to solve all problems that come up am slow cognitivly and have had hard time with keeping jobs because of my intolerance for stealing and cheating and lying about things i have witnessed with higher management.....light and noises are very painful to me also.... so yes it makes me eccentric and drives nuertipical crazy so i advoid people and large crouds but get very depressed from being alone all the time.I am fighting for social securittty disability have been for two years have a court hearing soon after a severe carr wreck and suffering post heptic nuerolgia that has enhanced because of the senseery over loads from the autism
ReplyDeleteTo Harold and other parents who dismiss Autistic Self-Advocates as being too "High-Functioning." You are wrong! Please read this quote from my friend, Amy, who is a non-speaking Autistic Self-Advocate who happens to require many services. She also happens to agree and stand with Ari Ne'eman and the Neurodiversity movement.
ReplyDelete"Besides, I believe most of the things that bother us about autism have to do with how the neurotypical world treats us, with how little accommodation, understanding and acceptance we might face.
I know some other things can affect autistics, like some health issues. They can be hard to deal with. But the more we promote acceptance, the more natural, for the neurotypical world, our differences will be. Then, we will be able to focus our energy on things that can give us a better quality of life. Isn’t that true for everyone, autistics and non-autistics?
I don’t need or want a cure. I am working on having a fulfilling autistic life; I am getting the support I need as I continue to fight for my rights; I have friends and allies. That’s a pretty good life. It is even, sometimes, an awesome life.
And I am happy, autistic happy." ~ Amy Sequenzia
- autismwomensnetwork.org/article/being-happy
Again I say, you are very wrong, Harold. It is not only the "High Functioning" that are demanding respect as part of the Neurodiversity movement, we are Autistics of all types. Here is another clue for you, we Autistic people reject you placing labels on us as high or low functioning. We are simply Autistic. We all have abilities and disabilities that we deal with.
Who has more right to advocate for Autism issues than Autistic people? Certainly not you, Harold! Autistic people are speaking up, it's time to listen to us!
I'm diagnosed on the autism spectrum, and I'm not a party to your rejecting of reality based functioning labels. There isn't some even set of strengths and weaknesses for each autistic, as it's been portrayed. The strengths/skills/abilities are disproportionately held by the higher-functioning on the spectrum. Anti-cure aggressors aren't needed to promote respect. Your side has had years of activism, yet hasn't accomplished anything to protect and sustain the many autistics out there.
DeleteYou missed the point that my friend is NOT as you say, 'high functioning' and she supports neurodiversity and acceptance. You should NOT be trying to dismiss any autistic person's viewpoint as coming from someone either too high or low functioning to count.
DeleteYou are dividing the Autism Community into "sides?" How misguided and sad.
There is no "cure." We need acceptance, not some endless fruitless, waste of time and resources searching for a non-existent 'cure.' Those wasted resources would be much better spent on supports for autistic people and their families.
Who are you to say what is misguided? You know that some on the spectrum are doing much better than others on the spectrum, as they have abilities and skills others on the spectrum don't. Many won't ignore that to promote comfort with the status quo.
DeleteThere isn't a cure cause research has to devise one. You shouldn't be calling it a waste of resources and time. It's called science/technology. Something that would lead to a new age of self-determination. Not continuation of dependence with static hierarchical relationships, and hand-me-down charity so helpers can pat themselves on the back and boost their reputations. What are "supports"? Supports aren't going to solve the problem of dependency. You can't prove that "supports" will make all autistics' lives bearable.
You are so right, autistic dad! Many or most of the difficulties we face is because of bigotry.
DeleteThank you Brenda! And thank you to the anonymous wit who came up with the excellent analogy about white people deciding who is black enough!
ReplyDeleteThank you, Brenda! This was a very clear and necessary post.
ReplyDeleteWonderful and thoughtful blog entry! Thank you from a mom of a 22 yr old with Aspergers.
ReplyDeleteWell said! We shouldn't always look to change people--whether they're autistic, gay, etc--as it's often our own biases that need to change. Since it's the centennial of Alan Turing's birth, I'm reminded of how much more he could have contributed to the world if society hadn't tried to change (and in the process, destroy) him because of his sexuality. Who knows if the the changes we're creating now for autistic individuals will save a future Alan Turing?
ReplyDeleteSeriously, think on it: Do you see GLAD or any gay rights organization promoting a "cure" for homosexuality? Why do our organizations treat us like we're diseased?
ReplyDeleteSuch an important post. Thank you Brenda!
ReplyDeleteNeurodiversity is not an ideology. It is fact. People process differently and "manifest" their knowledge differently. People see things differently. There is growing scientific evidence to support this. Ideologically, it is part of a necessary social movement, in this case, autism, to protect the rights of all individuals no matter what their "capacity" or "productivity" abilities. In other words, those are troubled ideas for determining normacly and therefore segregation of people with special needs. All people have a right to full citizenship, all individuals have something they can contribute, and if not, are still entitled to the same rights and freedoms as us all. Making black and white arguments, as Mr. Doherty has the inclination to do, are destructive to humanity and to obtaining any services or Inclusive rights for autistic or other individuals. We are different but equal. For another intersting post about Identity Crisis and the Disability Rights Movement, take a look here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2006/nov/29/socialcare.guardiansocietysupplement?CMP=twt_gu.
ReplyDelete